Estimate your body fat percentage using the U.S. Navy circumference method.
Fill in the fields on the left with your information, then press Calculate to see your result instantly. No sign-up required, and no data is sent anywhere — everything is calculated right in your browser.
The U.S. Navy method estimates body fat percentage using simple circumference measurements of the neck, waist, and (for women) hips, combined with height. It was developed for large-scale military fitness assessments where tools like calipers or DEXA scans weren't practical, and it remains popular today for its simplicity and reasonable accuracy for most body types. For the most precise measurement, clinical methods such as DEXA scans or hydrostatic weighing are recommended, but this method offers a solid at-home estimate. This calculator uses the U.S. Navy method, developed in the 1970s, which relies on neck and waist measurements (plus hip measurement for women) instead of specialized equipment. It's convenient enough for repeated home tracking, though more precise lab methods — DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, or bioelectrical impedance — remain the gold standard when an exact figure genuinely matters, such as for medical or competitive athletic purposes. Because this method relies entirely on manual tape measurements at specific body landmarks, the U.S. Navy itself trains personnel on exact measurement technique before using it for official assessments — a reminder that consistent technique matters as much as the formula itself when tracking this number for yourself at home over time.
Body fat percentage — the proportion of total body weight that is fat tissue rather than muscle, bone, organs, and water — is widely considered a more meaningful health indicator than total weight or even BMI, since two people at an identical weight can have dramatically different amounts of essential versus excess fat. The gold-standard measurement methods (DEXA scans, hydrostatic "underwater" weighing, or air displacement plethysmography) require specialized equipment found mainly in research labs and some gyms, which is why simpler estimation methods remain popular for everyday tracking.
This calculator uses the U.S. Navy circumference method, developed by Hodgdon and Beckett in 1984 for the U.S. Navy and later validated in civilian populations. It estimates body fat from a small set of tape measurements — neck and waist for men, with the addition of hip circumference for women — run through a logarithmic formula. Log-based equations were chosen specifically because the relationship between circumference and body fat isn't linear; the same increase in waist circumference represents a different amount of added fat depending on someone's starting size.
Because the method depends entirely on a handful of tape measurements, technique consistency matters enormously: using the same tape tension, the same anatomical landmarks, and preferably the same person taking the measurement each time, produces far more trustworthy trend data than a single one-off reading compared against a stranger's number. The Navy method also carries a margin of error — typically cited around ±3-4 percentage points compared to DEXA — which is well within acceptable range for tracking personal progress but not precise enough for clinical diagnosis or research purposes.
Tracked consistently every few weeks with the same technique, this calculator gives a genuinely useful trend line for body recomposition — whether the goal is fat loss, muscle gain, or simply understanding how body composition is shifting over time, independent of what the bathroom scale says.
It's generally accurate within a few percentage points for most people, though less precise for very lean or very obese individuals.
It's generally within a few percentage points of DEXA or hydrostatic weighing for most people, though accuracy can drop for those with unusual body proportions or very high muscle mass.
Measure at the navel level, keeping the tape snug but not compressing the skin.